We use cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to visit this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

THE BEST DIVORCE AND FAMILY LAW ATTORNEYS
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • The Team
  • A Comprehensive Guide to Divorce and Family Law
  • Practice Areas
    • Expertise in South African Family Law: International Expert Opinion Services.
    • Divorce >
      • The Divorce Process in South Africa
      • South Africa Divorce Guide: Understanding Contested and Uncontested Divorces
      • Uncontested Divorce in South Africa Guide
      • Contested Divorce >
        • International Divorce
        • Financial Divorce Checklist
        • Expatriate Divorce
        • Divorcing a Missing Spouse
        • Adultery and the Law
        • Divorcing-a-Narcissist-Guide
        • Trusts and Divorce
        • Living Annuities and Divorce in South Africa: A Comprehensive Analysis
    • Child Maintenance and Spousal Support
    • Spousal Maintenance in South Africa
    • Child Maintenance: A Comprehensive Guide for Calculating and Claiming
    • Rule 43
    • Protection Orders
    • Child Law >
      • Custody of Children
      • Paternity Disputes
      • Relocation Disputes
      • Parenting Plans
      • International Child Abduction
  • Services
    • Online Legal Services >
      • Online Divorce Services
      • Printable Divorce Application Form
      • Postnuptial Contracts >
        • Antenuptial Contract Questionnaire
    • More about South African Family Law >
      • Cohabitation Disputes
      • Domestic Violence and Abuse
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
    • Atlantic Seaboard
    • Paarl
    • West Coast
  • Choosing a Divorce Attorney
  • Blog
  • Family Law Attorney Correspondent
  • Divorce eBooks

The Family Law and Divorce Law Blog

Contempt of Court COVID

12/25/2020

9 Comments

 
Contempt of Court Covid
MN v SN (10540-16) [2020] ZAWCHC 157 (13 November 2020) 
Court: Western Cape Division, Cape Town
Case No: 10540/16
Date heard: 2 November 2020
Delivered: 13 November 2020
Judge: Rogers, J


HEAD NOTE 

Contempt of court – Where the husband breached a rule 43 order – The court recognized that the business that he worked for had experienced financial hardships due to covid – The husband did not earn a salary during some months – Despite the fact that he co-owned a fully paid house with his new partner well worth R3,5 million – It was held that he could not be expected to
force her to agree to sell a portion of the house – It was held that his contempt was not intentional and mala fide.

SUMMARY

The wife (applicant) wanted to hold her husband (the respondent) in contempt for violating a rule 43 order that was reached by agreement between the parties. It was common cause that the husband knew about the order and its provisions. The only thing that had to be decided was whether he transgressed the order willfully and with mala fides. If not, then he could not be found in contempt. (See Fakie No v CCII Systems (Pty) Ltd 2006 (4) SA 326 (SCA) para 14.

The matter was enrolled on the urgent court roll. Nevertheless, the parties had it postponed twice by agreement even though it was ready for hearing. The respondent contended that the court ought to strike the matter off the roll for lack of urgency on that basis. The court turned down his arguments. It was held that contempt proceedings are urgent by their nature simply because the vindication of the court’s authority is at stake (See Protea Holdings Ltd v Wriwt & another 1978 (3) SA 865 (W) at 868B-869A).

It was also reasoned that they are especially urgent mainly because it is often women and children who are in the care of the breached orders.

A technical argument for non-compliance with Rule 41A was also raised. This new rule calls for parties to try and mediate before coming court. The court refused the argument considering the legal representatives for the respondent did not persist on mediation throughout the exchange of the various notices. It was argued that there was a verbal agreement in which the parties consented that the husband would temporarily stop paying money for the domestic worker. A recording was made available as evidence, but the court found that the only impression drawn from the recording was that the husband was manipulative. The wife replied to his statements, spontaneously and emotionally.

Counsel for the husband also attempted to bring arguments based on set-off, as the wife owed some money to the husband’s family business. But the court found that an obligation to pay maintenance in respect of a wife and children is not susceptible to set-off (See Tregonong v Tregonong 1914 WLD 93, and Hodges v Coubrough NO 1990 (3) SA 58 (D) at 65A-B). Before concluding, the court observed that the family business encountered some severe financial difficulties due to COVID.

The husband used to own interests in the family business but was compelled to dispose of
them because of extensive borrowings from the company. Recently, there were some months in which he did not get a salary at all, and in other months he received TERS payment of around R6000,00. Even though he co-owned a R3,5 million property that was completely paid with his new partner, the court found it was unrealistic to have expected him to force his partner to agree to sell a portion of the house.

In summary, it was held that the husband could not be found in contempt. The costs of the suit were reserved for determination in the divorce trial.
9 Comments
ravindra link
5/24/2022 08:54:55 pm

Very Good & much Great. You are successful because you share all the Knowledge you know with others. That’s a Great sign! Good Luck
to the Future AND thanks.

Reply
Bankruptcy Lawyer in Cambridge link
7/22/2022 09:57:37 pm

Finding Bankruptcy Lawyer in Cambridge? So At VSR Law Firm office, we offer several solutions to help you reach your goals.

Reply
Orange County Family Law Lawyers link
5/25/2022 05:33:20 pm

The court refused the argument considering the legal representatives for the respondent did not persist on mediation throughout the exchange of the various notices. I truly appreciate your great post!

Reply
Orange County Divorce Lawyers link
5/25/2022 07:25:45 pm

The respondent contended that the court ought to strike the matter off the roll for lack of urgency on that basis. I truly appreciate your great post!

Reply
Debt Consolidation Program in Ontario link
7/21/2022 02:04:38 pm

Nice blog post so thanks a lot for sharing this great blog post.. keep more post for sharing.. have a nice day.

Reply
Robert Long link
8/2/2023 12:07:11 am

A recording was made available as evidence, but the court found that the only impression drawn from the recording was that the husband was manipulative. Thank you for making this such an awesome post!

Reply
Shirley A link
6/29/2024 06:21:53 am

Lovely blog you haave

Reply
KIM
8/22/2024 07:28:12 pm

I RECOMMEND THIS SPELL CASTER..🙂....

MY EX-BOYFRIEND RECONCILED WITH ME AFTER 3 YEEARS OF BREAK-UP.

HE NOW SHOWER ME WITH SO MUCH LOVE AND GIFT,

HE VOW NEVER TO BREAK-UP AGAIN..

FIX YOUR BROKEN RELATIONSHI/MARRIAGE.

MAKE YOUR EX FALL IN LOVE WITH YOU AGAIN…

THANKS YOU!!, [email protected]

KIM, USA

Reply
Vanessa
5/8/2025 01:11:08 am

Hello, it’s a lovely morning here.. I am Vanessa Craig, and I am writing this article to inform everyone that just because we overlook certain information due to our lack of knowledge doesn’t mean it isn’t real. I am currently valued at more than £70 Million Pounds because I acknowledged this vital information. I had assistance from a man named Meduza I found online whose impressive testimonials about his spell work are legit and genuine. His lottery spell enabled me to win £65 Million Pounds in the lottery by providing me with the accurate winning numbers after he performed a lottery spell for me. I placed my full trust in him and followed his instructions without any hesitation and right now, I am proud to say that Meduza’s spiritual advice for winning the lottery is superb and outstanding. I am very grateful to him for his help. To learn more, reach out to him at

WhatsApp: +1 807 907 2687
Email: [email protected]
Facebook: lordmeduzatemple

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Bertus Preller is a Family Law and Divorce Law Attorney at Maurice Phillips Wisenberg in Cape Town.

    Archives

    February 2025
    October 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    March 2021
    December 2020
    June 2020

    Categories

    All
    Abuse
    Child Maintenance
    Children
    Contempt Of Court
    Contested Divorce
    COVID Maintenance
    Divorce
    Divorce Types
    Finances
    International Uncontested Divorce
    Jurisdiction
    Maintenance
    Mediation
    Parental Rights
    Relocation
    Revenge Porn
    Rule 43
    Russian Divorce South Africa
    Same Sex Marriage
    Spousal Maintenance
    Uncontested Divorce

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    February 2025
    October 2023
    September 2023
    July 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    March 2021
    December 2020
    June 2020

    Categories

    All
    Abuse
    Child Maintenance
    Children
    Contempt Of Court
    Contested Divorce
    COVID Maintenance
    Divorce
    Divorce Types
    Finances
    International Uncontested Divorce
    Jurisdiction
    Maintenance
    Mediation
    Parental Rights
    Relocation
    Revenge Porn
    Rule 43
    Russian Divorce South Africa
    Same Sex Marriage
    Spousal Maintenance
    Uncontested Divorce

​In the News

Bertus Preller 702
Picture
Bertus Preller eNCA
Family Law Cape Talk
Bertus Preller 2Oceans Vibe
Bertus Preller Daily Maverick
Bertus Preller News24
Bertus Preller Business Insider
Bertus Preller Prontuit
Bertus Preller Sunday Times
Bertus Preller Parent24
Copyright 2025 - Maurice Phillips Wisenberg. Cape Town: 20th Floor, 2 Long Street, Cape Town, 8000;  Melkbosstrand: Suite 104, The Atlantic Beach Hotel, Cnr Commaille Road &, 13th Ave, Melkbosstrand, Cape Town, 7441; Paarl: Morgenzon St, Northern Paarl, Paarl, 7646.I  Email: [email protected]  I  Tel: +27 21 419 7115
Legal Notices Created by: SplashLaw
  • Home
  • The Firm
  • The Team
  • A Comprehensive Guide to Divorce and Family Law
  • Practice Areas
    • Expertise in South African Family Law: International Expert Opinion Services.
    • Divorce >
      • The Divorce Process in South Africa
      • South Africa Divorce Guide: Understanding Contested and Uncontested Divorces
      • Uncontested Divorce in South Africa Guide
      • Contested Divorce >
        • International Divorce
        • Financial Divorce Checklist
        • Expatriate Divorce
        • Divorcing a Missing Spouse
        • Adultery and the Law
        • Divorcing-a-Narcissist-Guide
        • Trusts and Divorce
        • Living Annuities and Divorce in South Africa: A Comprehensive Analysis
    • Child Maintenance and Spousal Support
    • Spousal Maintenance in South Africa
    • Child Maintenance: A Comprehensive Guide for Calculating and Claiming
    • Rule 43
    • Protection Orders
    • Child Law >
      • Custody of Children
      • Paternity Disputes
      • Relocation Disputes
      • Parenting Plans
      • International Child Abduction
  • Services
    • Online Legal Services >
      • Online Divorce Services
      • Printable Divorce Application Form
      • Postnuptial Contracts >
        • Antenuptial Contract Questionnaire
    • More about South African Family Law >
      • Cohabitation Disputes
      • Domestic Violence and Abuse
  • Testimonials
  • Contact
    • Atlantic Seaboard
    • Paarl
    • West Coast
  • Choosing a Divorce Attorney
  • Blog
  • Family Law Attorney Correspondent
  • Divorce eBooks